Abhijeet Bhattacharya Claims Gandhi Was Pakistan's Father of the Nation – Controversial Remarks Spark Debate

Renowned playback singer Abhijeet Bhattacharya has made a strong allegation about Mahatma Gandhi's involvement in the history of India and Pakistan, which has generated a lot of debate. Bhattacharya argues Gandhi should be considered the "Father of the Nation" for Pakistan rather than India's "Father of the Nation".
Known for his strong voice and hit songs from the 90s, the singer expressed his ideas in a chat implying that Gandhi was instrumental in founding Pakistan. Bhattacharya said, "India already exists. Pakistan came first. Gandhi so inadvertently became the Father of Our Nation.
His comments become divisive when he said, "Gandhi helped Pakistan come to be. He thereby became Pakistan's Father of the Nation, not for India." Strong responses from many spheres have been generated by these remarks, with some challenging his perspective of India's past and Gandhi's involvement in the nation's freedom fight.
Abhijeet Bhattacharya Say what?
Given the great respect Mahatma Gandhi commands in India, many people find Abhijeet Bhattacharya's words startling. With his nonviolent approach and civil disobedience guiding India towards liberation from British control in 1947, Gandhi is regarded as the principal player in the nation's fight for independence.
Bhattacharya, though, seems to object to the way Gandhi's influence in Indian history is seen. He contends that Gandhi's acts helped Pakistan to come to be as the nation was founded following India's freedom. Bhattacharya claims that Gandhi's actions during the independence struggle were mostly responsible for the division of India and the following birth of Pakistan.
Though extreme, this point of view is not totally fresh. Historians and political experts have disagreed about Gandhi's involvement in the split of India; some contend that his emphasis on nonviolence and efforts to placate Muslim leaders during the 1940s may have unintentionally helped to divide the subcontinent. Bhattacharya seems to be repeating a more extreme take on this point of view.
Reactions to the Statement of Abhijeet
Not surprisingly, Bhattacharya's remarks on social media have caused indignation since many have accused him of slanting history. One Twitter user questioned: "How can anyone say Gandhi was the Father of Pakistan?" "Gandhi battled for India's freedom; the decisions taken by the Muslim League leaders and the British produced Pakistan."
Others, on the other hand, view Bhattacharya's comment as only an opinion; some even think that Gandhi's leadership throughout the independence fight might have helped to shape the circumstances preceding the division. Some say Gandhi's attempts to unite the varied population of India—including Muslims—may have unintentionally helped to separate the nation.
Bhattacharya, on the other hand, has not changed his opinions in spite of strong criticism. He has been defending his point of view, claiming that others are entitled to their own points of view and that his own is grounded on historical interpretation.
Mahatma Gandhi's Legacy
Still one of nonviolence, peace, and social justice, Mahatma Gandhi's legacy in India and elsewhere Leading the Salt March, the Quit India Movement, and other initiatives energising the Indian people in their struggle against British colonialism was he. His vision was of a united and peaceful India where religious differences did not split the people, not alone of an autonomous one.
Still one of the most horrific episodes in South Asian history, nevertheless, the division of India in 1947 resulted in the founding of Pakistan. Along with millions more displaced, at than a million people perished amid the conflict between Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs. Though commendable, Gandhi's attempts to keep peace at this time were finally ineffective in stopping the division.
In summary
The remarks of Abhijeet Bhattacharya have surely given the current discussions on Gandhi's influence on India's past more impetus. Although orthodox historical accounts would say his comments are not totally true, they represent a viewpoint that challenges the established stories. Whether one agrees with Bhattacharya or not, his comment has unquestionably started a discussion on the nuances of India's past and the legacy of its leaders.
It is abundantly evident as the debate goes on that Mahatma Gandhi's influence in the history of India and Pakistan will always cause intense emotions and debates for years to come.
--